SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Randip Singh vs State Of Haryana on 16 July, 2019

CRM-M-29062-2019 (O M) -1-

CRM-M-29062-2019 (O M)
Date of Decision:16.07.2019

Randip Singh …Petitioner


State of Haryana …Respondent


Present: Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana.



Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.249 dated

14.06.2016, under Section 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Sushant

Lok, Gurugram, Haryana.

The FIR was registered on the complaint given by Assistant

Registrar, Cooperative Society Gurugram on the ground that the office

bearers of Ram Shanti Cooperative Group Housing Society, Gurugram did

not hand over the record of the Society to the Inspector and

recommendation was made for registration of the case. On the basis of the

said complaint., the FIR was registered for the offence punishable under

Section 406 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner

was falsely indicted in the case, who was in technological consultancy
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on – 22-07-2019 01:41:01 :::
CRM-M-29062-2019 (O M) -2-

business. According to him, the petitioner was arrested on 30.04.2019 and

the challan stands filed in the case qua him on 24.06.2019. He submits that

actual office bearers, who have been accused of not handing over the record

are yet to be arrested. He submits that further custody of the petitioner may

not be justified.

On the other hand, bail application is opposed by learned State

counsel. It is not disputed that the investigation qua him is complete and

challan stands filed.

Considering the above background and the fact that the

offences are triable by Magistrate, further detention of the petitioner may

not be justified. Therefore, without meaning any expression on the merits of

the case, it is ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail subject

to his furnishing requisite bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial

Court concerned.

The petition is allowed.

16.07.2019 (MANOJ BAJAJ)
sheetal JUDGE
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
22-07-2019 01:41:02 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation