HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 6809/2018
Ranjeet S/o Shri Pema, by caste-Banjara aged about 25 Years,
Fala Manderi, Police Station Dhambola, District Dungarpur.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan , Through PP
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mathur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Uppadhaya, Public
Prosecutor
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA KUMAR MATHUR
Order
10/08/2018
The present anticipatory bail application under Section
438 of Cr.P.C. has been filed in connection with FIR No.03/2018
Police Station Dhambola, District- Dungarpur for the offence
under Sections 498A, 304B IPC registered against applicant.
Brief facts of the case are that the complainant Amar Singh
son of Parthi Banjara, resident of Samgadha lodged a report at
police Station Dhambola against the petitioner and others, stating
inter alia, that his daughter was married with the petitioner on
07.05.2011 as per social rites and rituals at Samgadha. The
accused persons used to harass and tease his daughter and were
demanding dowry. Two years back his daughter was turned out
from the house and a sum of Rs.50,000/- were demanded for
going to Kuwait. Therefore, Rs.50,000/- were given in presence of
Pratap and Ishwar so that the house of his daughter may not
break down. On the day of Deepawali the petitioner and his
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6809/2018]
daughter came to his house and accused Ranjeet demanded
Rs.2,00,000/- for constructing house. When his daughter resisted,
the accused became angry and threatened to oust her from house
and to kill her. Two days before the the date of incident i.e.
04.11.2017 her daughter Rajni informed on telephone about
quarrel on demand of Rs.2 lacs. After murdering her daughter, the
accused took her to Meghraj and Modasa hospital, but he and his
family members were not informed.
It was contended that the petitioner is an innocent person
and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and in the
police investigation it has come that the deceased had love affairs
with one Vishan. During investigation the police recorded the
statements of Vishan in which he has admitted that he used to
talk to lthe deceased on mobile. When the petitioner came to
know this fact, the deceased attempted to suicide.
It was also submitted that the deceased was not happy with
her marriage with the petitioner, because earlier the engagement
of the elder sister of the deceased took place with the petitioner.
However, two days before her marriage she ran away. Thereafter
the father of the deceased solemnized marriage of the deceased
with the petitioner. The petitioner came from Kuwait 8 days before
the date of incident and was living happily with his wife.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned
Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
Having considered all the relevant facts and circumstances of
the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant anticipatory
bail to the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6809/2018]
Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the even of arrest of applicant in connection with FIR
No.03/2018 Police Station Dhambola, District- Dungarpur, the
accused-applicant- Ranjeet S/o Shri Pema shall be released on
bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/SHO on the
following conditions:-
(1) He shall make himself available for interrogation by
Investigating Officer as and when required;
(2) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court
or to any Police Officer;
(3) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the
trial court.
(VIRENDRA KUMAR MATHUR),J.
Ravi Kh./106
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
