SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ratheesh vs State Of Kerala on 15 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

FRIDAY ,THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1940

Bail Appl..No. 1742 of 2019

CRIME NO. 914/2018 OF Alathur Police Station , Palakkad

PETITIONER/S:

1 RATHEESH, AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. VASU, AJEESH NILAYAM, CHIRAKODE,
ATHIPOTTA, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

2 RAJESH, AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. VASU, AJEESH NILAYAM, CHIRAKODE,
ATHIPOTTA, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

3 VASU, AGED 62 YEARS
S/O. LATE KUMARAN, AJEESH NILAYAM, CHIRAKODE,
ATHIPOTTA, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

4 GEETHA, AGED 54 YEARS
W/O. VASU, AJEESH NILAYAM, CHIRAKODE,
ATHIPOTTA, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
::2::
Bail Appl..No. 1742 of 2019

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
—————————–
B.A.No.1742 Of 2019
———————————
Dated this the 15th day of March, 2019.

ORDER

The petitioners are the four accused in Crime No.914/2018 of

Alathur Police Station, Palakkad District, which has been

registered for offences punishable under Secs.498A, 323, 341, 406

354B r/w Sec.34 of the I.P.C.

2. The brief of the prosecution allegation is that the

accued being the husband and in-laws of the defacto complainant

had subjected her to both mental and physical cruelty demanding

more dowry and that the 2nd accused had torn her dress and

thereby outraged her modesty.

3. It is now submitted by the learned Prosecutor on the

basis of instructions of the Investigating Officer that the accused

had co-operated with the investigation process and the

investigation has been completed and final report has also been

filed and arrest and detention of the petitioner are no longer

necessary as the investigation process has been duly completed
::3::

Bail Appl..No. 1742 of 2019

and it is for the petitioners to file application for regular bail before

the jurisdictional court concerned, etc.

4. In the light of the abovesaid submission it is ordered

that as and when the jurisdictional Magistrate concerned takes

cognizance and issues summons for appearance of the

petitioners/accused, then it is for the petitioners to thereupon

immediately appear before the learned Magistrate concerned and

then make application for regular bail, taking note of the

submission made on behalf of the Investigating Officer that the

accused persons have already co-operated with the investigation

process and that arrest and detention of the petitioners are no

longer required.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail

Application stands disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
Judge.

bkn/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh