SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rattan Lal @ Bunty &Ors. vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 2 December, 2011

Delhi High Court Rattan Lal @ Bunty &Ors. vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 2 December, 2011Author: Suresh Kait

$~3

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3647/2011

% Judgment delivered on: 2nd December, 2011

RATTAN LAL @ BUNTY &ORS. ….. Petitioner Through : Mr. Parmanand, Adv.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ….. Respondent Through : Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP.

Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv. for R2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide FIR No. 262/2010, a case under Sections 498A/406/34 was registered against the petitioners on the complaint of complainant/respondent No. 2 at P.S. Shalimar Bagh.

2 Learned counsel further submits that all the disputes among the parties have been settled amongst the parties for a total sum of Rs.3Lacs to be paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2. 3 Respondent No. 2 is personally present in the court today with her counsel, Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advocate who duly identifies

Crl.M.C3647/2011 Page 1 of 2 her. W/SI Ina, P.S. Shalimar Bagh also identifies the respondent No. 2. She further submits that she has received the balance amount of Rs.50,000/- today in cash from petitioner No.1 in the court today and she accepts the same.

4 Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, on instructions submits that respondent No. 2 is no more interested in pursuing the case further in lieu of settlement arrived at between the parties. The marriage between the parties has already been dissolved vide decree of mutual consent dated 07.06.2011.

5 Keeping in view the statement of respondent No. 2 and the fact that the marriage of respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 1 has already been dissolved, I quash the FIR No. 262/2010 registered at P.S. Shalimar Bagh, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom. 6 Criminal M.C. 3647/2011 is allowed and disposed of. 7 Dasti.

SURESH KAIT,J

DECEMBER 02, 2011

j

Crl.M.C3647/2011 Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation