SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ravi Kumar vs Ritu Kamal on 6 July, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CR No.3123 of 2018
Date of decision: 06.07.2018

Ravi Kumar ….. Petitioner

Versus

Ritu Kamal ….. Respondent

BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. WALIA.

Present: Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

B.S. Walia, J. (Oral)

[1] Prayer is for issuance of direction’s to the learned trial Court to

expeditiously decide the application filed under Sections 7 and 25 of the

Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 as well as under Section 13 of the Hindu

Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

[2] Learned counsel contends that the applications were filed on

20.11.2017 and despite number of dates, the same have not been decided till

date without any plausible justification in respect thereto.

[3] A perusal of the zimni orders reveals that the case had been

adjourned on joint request of counsel for the parties, but learned counsel

contends that the petitioner never made any request for adjournment and in

fact the same would be counter-productive to the claim put forth by the

petitioner in the application.

[4] I have considered the submissions of learned counsel and am of

the view that the orders passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior

Division), Phagwara reflect the correct version of the court proceedings. In

1 of 2
22-07-2018 07:15:22 :::
CR No.3123 of 2018 [2]

case of stand that the position was otherwise, the only remedy available to

the petitioner was to get the orders modified by moving an appropriate

application.

[5] In the circumstances, I find no merit in the instant petition.

Needless to mention, it would be open to the petitioner to argue the case

before the learned Trial Court on the next date of hearing and this Court is

sanguine that in the eventuality of arguments being addressed by the

petitioner on the next date the learned trial Court would make every effort to

decide the applications as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

[6] Revision petition is dismissed in the light of the above.

(B.S. Walia)
Judge
06.07.2018
amit

1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No.

2. Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
22-07-2018 07:16:08 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation