SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 7 February, 2020

$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 07.02.2020

+ CRL.M.C. 698/2020
RAVINDER @ RAVI ORS ….. Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ruchi Sinha, Advocate

versus

STATE ANR ….. Respondent
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with
SI Manoj P.S. Kanjhawala.
Mr. Saurabh Srivastava, Advocate for
R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 2882/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exception.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 698/2020

3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

828/2014 dated 16.10.2014 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and

consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

CRL.M.C. 698/2020 Page 1 of 3

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 20.02.2012 as per

Hindu rites and rituals and out of the said wedlock two children, namely,

Son Yansh and daughter Jivika were born.

7. Petitioners and respondent No.2, with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement vide

Memorandum of Understanding executed on 07.01.2020 and settled all their

disputes amicably.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Manoj of Police Station Kanjhawala and submits that matter

has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any

further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 828/2014 dated

16.10.2014 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala instituted for the

CRL.M.C. 698/2020 Page 2 of 3
offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

12. Dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 7, 2020
Aj

CRL.M.C. 698/2020 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation