SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Reena Rana vs Union Of India And Others on 6 January, 2020

CWP No.33515 of 2018 [1]


Civil Writ Petition No. 33515 of 2018
Date of Decision: January 06 , 2020.

Reena Rana …… PETITIONER (s)


Union of India and others …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Ms. Bhupinder Kaur, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Shweta Nahata, Advocate
for respondents No.1 and 3.

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl.AG, Haryana
for respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the

respondents to impound and cancel/revoke the passports and travel documents of

the accused in FIR No.87 dated 01.07.2014, under Sections 323/406/420/294/

354/498A/506/120B IPC registered at Police Station Raipur Rani, District


Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that two of the accused

1 of 2
18-01-2020 23:10:36 :::
CWP No.33515 of 2018 [2]

i.e., parents-in-law and one of the sisters-in-law, stand acquitted in the said FIR

and Kuldeep Singh – husband, Sandeep and Gurdeep Singh – brothers-in-law as

well as Renu – sister-in-law of the petitioner, have been declared proclaimed


Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3 while referring to

affidavit dated 25.07.2019 of Mr. Amit Kumar Rawat, Deputy Passport Officer,

Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh, submits that the process for impounding

the passport of Kuldeep Singh, initiated on 18.07.2019, would be taken to its

logical end. It is further submitted that the necessary details in respect to

Sandeep, Gurdeep Singh and Renu have not been furnished by the petitioner. In

case, the same are furnished by the petitioner, necessary action in this regard

shall also be taken.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the necessary details

in respect to the other persons shall be furnished by the petitioner within two

months. Needless to say, necessary action in terms of affidavit dated 25.07.2019,

be then taken by the authorities.

In view of the above, no further directions are required to be passed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of.

January 06 , 2020. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
18-01-2020 23:10:37 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation