SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rikky Angrish And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 11 January, 2018

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2279 / 2017
1. Rikky Angrish son of Shri Rajneesh Sharma
2. Rajneesh Sharma son of Shri Yashpal Sharma
3. Teena Sharma wife of Shri Rajneesh Sharma
All by caste Brahamin, Residents of B-12, Lotus Villa, Gyan
Vihar, University Ke Pas, Jagatpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District
1. State Of Rajasthan through PP
2. Kirti Raghav @ Aaliya daughter of Shri Madan Singh Raghav,
aged 31 years, By caste Rajput, At present r/o E-5, Path
No.6, Jamna Nagar, Sodala, Tehsil and District Jaipur.

For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Bharti Sharma.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Godara, PP
Mr. Shailendra Singh.


Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the

offence under Section 406 IPC compromise was submitted before

the learned trial court, which has been attested and the accused-

petitioners have been acquitted for the offence under Section 406

IPC on 04.04.2017. He submits that now the offence under

Section 498A IPC is under trial.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 Kirti

Raghav admits the aforesaid fact.

(2 of 2)

It is also admitted by both the sides that on the basis of

mutual consent, a decree of divorce has also been passed by the

learned Family Court No.1, Jaipur.

Looking to the fact that the matrimonial dispute has been

settled between the parties amicably and the offence under

Section 406 IPC has also been compounded and order to keep the

harmonious and peaceful relations between the parties, it will not

be proper to continue the trial for the offence under Section 498A

IPC. Continuation of such proceeding is merely abuse of process of

law and will not serve any purpose.

In view of above, the misc. petition is allowed and the

proceedings pending before the Court of Additional Civil Judge-

cum- Metropolitan Magistrate No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan in

Criminal Case No.262/2015 (State vs. Rikky Angrish Ors.) for

the offence under Section 498A IPC is quashed and set-aside.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation