SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rizwan S/O Rehamathulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 7 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court Rizwan S/O Rehamathulla Khan vs State Of Karnataka on 7 December, 2010Author: N.Ananda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN GALORE DATED THIS THE 7m DAY OF DECEMBER BEFORE i’ V V

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICEE

CRIMINAL PETITION Noi55%1i1/zoio BETVVEEN:

1.

Rizwan

S/o Rehamathulla

Major :

R/o Gopaiapura ‘

Magadi Roa_d~__

Bangalore’.

Imran ~ V

S / o VReham:ath1i’£ia Khan _ V Aged_Maj-or ‘ ‘

R / o Gopalapuwrax . ~ u it Magadi’*R_oad 4′

Bangalore’; T.

‘T ” {By §ri.Nisa1*.Sab,HAdV§} “r’lu_fD_;iV’ or ‘ A’ Stateof by

iVsi~1o,’Maigacii Road Poiice ., 1 t ” — __ Bangalore ” City A ..jReptid-,by Govt. Pieader _I?Iigh Court Buildings

V’ ___”‘«”Ba;33ga1ore City. V’ ” ‘.v.(1§5:y Sri.Vijayakumar Majage, HCGP] . . PETITI ONERS

. . .RESPON DENT

This Cr1.P is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C praying to eniarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.147/2010 of Magadi Road Police 2

Station, Bangalore City and now C.C.No.38529/2010 on the file of the III ACMM, Bangalore, registered for offences punishable under sections 498A, 302 r/w 34 IPC and sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. This petition coming on for orders this dayffthe Court made the following: O R D E R , ”

in Crl.P 5512/2010, I have held that?the’-5firs’t~~~.e – accused [elder brother of these petitioners) ll deceased on fire. The investigationzre:e_ords’lid-ollnot the presence of these petitioners at the of l’ occurrence’. = i. p _

hereforelgTwithoutlgoing into further details, the direction slo’ullgl1tpto_rti.sl ‘granted for a limited period to ‘~ ..enaEj_le the petitione-r—to seek regular bail. ‘ ‘V I pass the following: ORDER

Petition is accepted. Petitioners are granted bail, subject to following conditions: ll

3

If the petitioners/accused No.3 and 4 are arrested in Crime No.14?/2010 of Magadi Eioad I-“‘.S., Bangalore City, registered punishable under Sections l.P.C., and also for

Sections 3 and 4 ofrthe Dlowry Prophibition 1961, they shall be lfrelfeased on their executing bond_s’ffor ‘R_s.25,000/ — each offering a suret.y.–for».tl’1feA ” and 4 shall not

intimild-‘ate_f’tori”-.ta;rt1per with the prosecution Witnesvses. l

Petitlioners/ac’cused No.3 and 4 for the purpose investigation, shall appear before the if Officer, Whenever called upon to so.

i his order would be operative for a period of two months from today within such time, petitioners shall seek regular bail before the jurisdictional Court. In such an event, the .’4

4 ,

learned Judge of the jurisdictional Court shall consider bail

appiications Without being influenced by observations made in this order.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation