SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rohit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 8 October, 2018

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3472 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2016 Thana -M AHILA P.S. District- PATNA

Rohit Kumar, S/o Dilip Singh @ Dilip Kumar Singh, Resident in the house o f
Rajendra Prasad Singh in Mohalla R.P.S. More, Lane No. 21, P.S. Danapur, District

– Patna.

…. …. Appellant/s

1. The State of Bihar.

…. …. Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, S.P.P.

Date: 08-10-2018

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the

refusal of prayer for regular bail vide order dated 09.08.2018 in

Special Case No. 307 of 2016 arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 45

of 2016 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-

Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Patna in connection with the

aforesaid case registered under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal

Code, Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act as well as Section

3(i)(x)(xi) of the SC/ST Act.

The informant had entered into marriage with the

appellant after friendship of 8 years. Marriage was not recognized by
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3472 o f 2018 dt.08-10-2018


the family members and in that situation, the FIR has come up.

Appellant is in custody since 19.06.2018. Investigation of the case is

complete now.

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer

for bail.

Considering the facts of this and period already

undergone, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Court below where the case is pending in connection with the

aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully

cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the

court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant

as well as condition that both the bailors shall be resident of the

territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this

appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J)

Uploading Date 09.10.2018
Date 09.10.2018

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation