SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rohit Rana & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 12 September, 2019

$~56
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 12.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4578/2019
ROHIT RANA ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through: Ms. Anu Sharma, Mr. Prince Gupta
and Mr. Anshul Garg and Mr. Rukban
Tyagi, Advs.
versus
STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for State with
SI Ravi Rana
Mr. Jayant Dabas and Mr. Nitesh,
Adv. for R-2

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 35644/2019
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4578/2019

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

32/2016, dated 21.01.2016, registered at Police Station – Bawana (Outer) for

the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and

consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

CRL.M.C. 4578/2019 Page 1 of 3

Notice.

Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent No.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

The petitioner no.1 and respondent No.2 got married on 10.03.2015

as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioner No. 1 and respondent No.2, they started living separately from

13.12.2015.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 entered into an amicable

settlement vide compromise deed dated 09.03.2018 and settled all their

disputes amicably. The total settlement amount is Rs.6,50,000/-, out of

which Rs.4,50,000/- have already been paid and a demand draft bearing No.

427798 dated 20.08.2019 for the balance amount of Rs.2 lakhs, in favour of

Jyoti/ respondent No. 2 has been handed over to her today in the Court.

The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Ravi Rana of Police Station – Bawana and submits that the

matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any

further.

CRL.M.C. 4578/2019 Page 2 of 3

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 32/2016 dated 21.01.2016

registered at Police Station – Bawana (Outer) for the offences punishable

under Sections 498A/Section406/Section509 of the IPC and consequent proceedings

therefrom are quashed.

The petition is allowed accordingly.

Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court

Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019
PB

CRL.M.C. 4578/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation