SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rohitash Son Of Sugad Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2989/2021

1. Rohitash Son Of Sugad Singh, R/o Dundoli, Nuhun District
Mewat (Haryana).
2. Ravi @ Dayaram Son Of Sugad Singh, R/o Dundoli,
Nuhun District Mewat (Haryana).
3. Deviram Son Of Sugad Singh, R/o Dundoli, Nuhun District
Mewat (Haryana).
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Smt. Sunita Wife Of Shri Dayaram D/o Shri Brijendra
Singh, R/o Village Hadoli, Ps Punhana, District Nuhun
Mewat At Present Village Paramdara, Ps Khoh, District
Bharatpur
—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. through VC
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Adv. through VC

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

08/07/2021

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.72/2019

dated 05.06.2019 registered at Police Station Khoh, District

Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 498-A, 406 and 323 of

IPC and consequential criminal proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel

for the respondent submitted that compromise has been arrived

between the parties and they have settled their dispute.

(Downloaded on 12/07/2021 at 09:25:46 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2989/2021]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial court

had attested compromise under Section 406 IPC. Offence under

Section 498-A IPC is non-compoundable. So, criminal proceedings

pending between them, be set aside.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments

advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledging the

factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that he

has no objection if the FIR in question and consequential criminal

proceeding are quashed.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the

record.

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute

between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of

compromise and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court of

India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10

SCC 303 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6

SCC 466, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in

question and consequential criminal proceeding.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.

The FIR No.72/2019 dated 05.06.2019 registered at Police Station

Khoh, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 498-A, 406

and 323 of IPC and consequential criminal proceedings are

quashed.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Gourav/70

(Downloaded on 12/07/2021 at 09:25:46 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation