SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Roop Chand Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 28 August, 2019


?Court No. – 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 35269 of 2019

Applicant :- Roop Chand Yadav

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Tiwari,Vikram Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

Case called out repeatedly.

It has been informed that the High Court Bar Association has given a call for strike today, therefore the learned counsels are not appearing in Court. However, Sri Om Narain Tripathi, learned A.G.A. Ist assisted by Sri Jitendra Kumar, Sri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Sri Mahesh Kumar Dwivedi and Sanjay Kumar Rajbher, learned A.G.A.s, Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, Sri Bhanu Prakash Singh, Sri Rajeev Kumar Rai, Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha and Sri Subosh Kumar Dwivedi, learned brief holders for the State have submitted that this bail may be considered and disposed of on merit.

I have heard the learned A.G.A.s/brief holders for the State and perused the record.

Upon perusal of the grounds of bail, as averred in the accompanying affidavit appended to this bail application, it transpires that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He happens to be brother-in-law ‘(devar)’ and merely on account of his relationship with the husband of the deceased, he has been deliberately roped-in, in this case. There is no motive to commit the offence. He has no concern with the so called demand of dowry and he is not the beneficiary of the same. The applicant never raised any demand for dowry. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 2.4.2019.

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Considered the grounds urged in support of the bail application and also considered the submissions made by learned A.G.A.s/brief holders for the State, grounds urged are made out for bail.

Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant – Roop Chand Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 45 of 2019, under Sections – 498A, 306, 34 SectionI.P.C., Police Station – Bahariya, District – Allahabad be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Order Date :- 28.8.2019




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation