SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rooplal vs State on 3 January, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 11815 / 2017
Rooplal S/o Megha, Aged About 50 Years, B/c Mogaya, R/o Parliya,
P.S. Badisadari, Dist. Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Lodged At
District Jail Chittorgarh)

—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.A.P.Singh.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.V.S.Rajpurohit, P.P.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
03/01/2018

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in relation to

F.I.R. No.89/2017, P.S. Badisadari, District Chittorgarh, for the

offences under Sections 323, 325, 354B, 376, 498A I.P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

The prosecutrix Mst.L upon being examined under Section

164 Cr.P.C. did not support the case set up in the F.I.R. and denied

that the petitioner had subjected her to rape. In this background

and having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as

available on record, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner

deserves to be enlarged on bail.

(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11815/2017]

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner namely Rooplal arrested in connection

with F.I.R. No.89/2017, P.S. Badisadari, District Chittorgarh shall

be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of

Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear

before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called

upon to do so.

(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.

/tarun goyal/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh