SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rupinderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 4 December, 2017

CRM No.M-28398 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 28398 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: December 4 , 2017.

Rupinderjit Singh …… PETITIONER (s)
State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Ms. Neeraj Chandel, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

None for respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.136 dated 26.11.2016 under Sections 498A/323/506 IPC

registered at Police Station Patti, District Tarn Taran.

It is submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the

parties during the pendency of this petition. The petitioner and his wife have

filed petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is

submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and he undertakes to abide

1 of 2
09-12-2017 06:35:18 :::
CRM No.M-28398 of 2017

by the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

Therefore, it is prayed that this petition be allowed.

This matter had been adjourned to enable learned counsel for the

State to verify the factum of settlement between the parties.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Surinder

Pal, verifies that the petitioner and his wife decided to part ways in an amicable

manner and they have filed petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage

Act, 1955. A copy of the petition is available on the police file. The petitioner,

it is verified, has joined investigation pursuant to interim order passed by this


There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is

likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing

true facts before the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits thereof, this petition

is allowed. Consequently, order dated 04.08.2017 is made absolute.

It is clarified that none of the observations made hereinabove shall

be construed to be a reflection on the merits of the case. The same are solely

confined for the purpose of decision of the present petition.

December 4 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
09-12-2017 06:35:19 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation