SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sachin Singh And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 5 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48385 of 2014
Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-150 Year-2012 Thana- AJAM NAGAR District- Katihar

1. Sachin Singh, S/o Audhi Singh, resident of Village- Haspur, P.S. Azamnagar,
District- Katihar.

2. Siltu Singh

3. Awan Singh

4. Mantu Singh

5. Gajendra Singh All S/o Audhi Singh

6. Hemtha Devi W/o Audhi Singh

7. Prakash Singh S/o Late Khankati Singh

8. Bagmal Singh S/o Purwai Singh Sl. No. 2 to 8 are Resident of Village
Harpur, P.S. Azamnagar, District Katihar.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Somari Devi W/o Sachin Singh, Resident of Village Haspur, P.S.
Azamnagar, District- Katihar.

… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
For the O. P. No. 2 : Mr. Md. Qumrul Hoda, Advocate

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 05-03-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned A.P.P.

for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioners have moved the Court under Section

482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the following

relief:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48385 of 2014 dt.05-03-2019
2/2

“That this is an application for quashing the order
dated 13-5-2013 passed by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Katihar in Azamnagar P.S. Case No.
150/12 whereby cognizance of offence under section
341, 323, 494, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code
has been taken and petitioners have been summoned
to face trial.”

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

petitioners submitted that they may be permitted to withdraw the

application with liberty to move before the Court below itself at

the appropriate stage.

4. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for

the petitioners, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn

with liberty aforesaid.

5. If any application is filed by the petitioners before the

Court below at the appropriate stage, the same shall be considered

on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being

prejudiced by the present order.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

Anjani/-

AFR/NAFR
U
T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation