SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sadan Kumar Verma vs The State Of Bihar on 7 January, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85677 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran

SADAN KUMAR VERMA Son of Late Durga Prasad Resident of Village –
Saket Bihar, Mitra Mandal Colony, Anisabad, P.S.- Phulwarisarif, Distt.-
Patna, presently Posted in Forest Department at Begusarai, P.O. and P.S.-
Begusarai, Dist.- Begusarai
… … Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Seema Verma W/o Sadan Kumar Verma, D/o Late Krishndeo Prasad
Resident of Village – Dahiyawan, Mahmud Chowk, P.S.- Chapra Town,
Distt.- Saran.

… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, A.P.P.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 07-01-2020

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This petition is for quashment of FIR of Chapra Town

P.S. Case No. 06 of 2019 registered under Sections 498A, 420,

406, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the written

complaint of opposite party no. 2.

According to FIR, opposite party no. 2 married with the

petitioner on 20.04.2001. After sometimes, there was demand of a

Scorpio Vehicle and for non-fulfillment of demand, opposite party

no. 2 was being tortured even by commission of assault. Further

allegation is that the petitioner had suppressed to opposite party

no. 2 at the time of marriage that first wife of the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85677 of 2019 dt.07-01-2020
2/2

already dead and she died leaving behind two daughters and a son.

Further allegation is that the petitioner is in relationship of

different girls and always assaults to opposite party no. 2 when

opposite party no. 2 protested the act of the petitioner. The FIR

further discloses other cases lodged by opposite party no. 2 against

the petitioner under the Domestic Violence Act and for

maintenance.

In my view, the FIR discloses commission of cognizable

offence, hence, it cannot be quashed on the ground that allegation

is not believable and acceptable. The correctness of the allegation

would be subject matter of the investigation. Hence, I am not

inclined to interfere with the matter in exercise of power under

Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

(Birendra Kumar, J)

Kundan/-

AFR/NAFR N.A.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 08.01.2020
Transmission Date 08.01.2020

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation