1

02.05.2018

Ct.28
RP 64
CRM 1692 of 2018

In Re : An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dattapukur P.S.
Case No.954 of 2017 dated 17.11.2017 under Sections
498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code (corresponding to GR
Case No.3834 of 2017).

And

In the matter of : Sadhan Majumdar
…. Petitioner

Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Biswajit Manna, Adv.

….. For the Petitioners

Mr. S.G. Mukherjee, Ld. P.P.

Mr. P.P. Das, Adv.

….. For the State

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in

custody for 156 days. It is further submitted that he has been

falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations against the

petitioner who is the father-in-law of the victim housewife and in

view of the period of detention suffered by him and the fact that
2

investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant bail to the

petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on

bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-( Rupees Ten Thousand

only) with two sureties of like amount, one of whom shall be local,

to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Barasat, North 24 Parganas on condition that he shall not

intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any

manner whatsoever. He shall appear before the trial Court on every

date of hearing and in the event he fails to do so, the trial Court

shall be at liberty to cancel his bail without further reference to

this Court.

The application for bail is, thus, allowed.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

delivered to the learned advocates for the parties, upon compliance

of usual formalities.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3