SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sahabram vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 May, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2756/2019

Sahabram S/o Ladhuram, Aged About 55 Years, By Caste Jat,
R/o Home Lend City, National Highway-15, District
Sriganganagar

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Vedprakash S/o Harlal Jat, B/c Jat, R/o 1-C-19,
Jawaharnagar, Dist. Sriganganagar

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Shrimali.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Tak, PP.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

28/05/2019

The present misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has

been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the order passed by

the learned Addl. Civil Judge-cum-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

No.1, Sri Ganganagar by which the cognizance has been taken

against the accused petitioner and accused petitioner has been

summoned.

A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the

petitioner that he will raise all the objections at the time of charge

but since the accused is ready to appear before the trial Court, the

trial Court may be directed to release the petitioner on bail. Since

earlier, after investigation Final Report was proposed by the Police

and later on the Police submitted chargsheet against the petitioner

(Downloaded on 28/06/2019 at 06:54:30 AM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2756/2019]

for the offence under Section 406 IPC, the petitioner is ready to

appear before the trial Court but he may be released on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer made by the

petitioner.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and

upon perusal of the challan papers. The earlier Investigating

Officer found that no case is made out against the petitioner but

later on the investigation was changed and filed challan against

the petitioner for the offence under Section 406 IPC. In view of

limited prayer made by the petitioner so also taking into

consideration the fact that the petitioner is ready to appear before

trial Court on the stipulated date. Petitioner is directed to appear

before the trial Court on or before 10.6.2019 then the trial Court

release the petitioner on bail and submit the bail bonds for the

sum of Rs.30,000/-. If the petitioner does not appear on or before

10.06.2019, then the trial Court may issue arrest warrant against

the petitioner.

With these observations, the criminal misc. petition is

disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
171-Ishan/-

(Downloaded on 28/06/2019 at 06:54:30 AM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation