SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Saibal Ganguly vs Sarami Ganguly on 28 April, 2017

1

28.04.2017
(26)

AKS

C.O. No. 4179 of 2016

Saibal Ganguly
Vs.

Sarami Ganguly

Ms. Deboleena Ganguly
…for the petitioner.

Mr. Sarathi Dasgupta
Ms. Subhasree Patel
… for the opposite party.

This application being C.O. 4179 of 2016 though has been assailing the order

no.16 dated 16-08-2016, but virtually the main moto is to seek direction of this court so

that the matrimonial suit as well as the pending application under Section 36 of the

Special Marriage Act be expedited within the stipulated period.

Mr. Dasgupta, learned Advocate, being assisted by Ms. Patel representing the

opposite party/wife submitted that he has already filed Vokalatnama in the

department.

Ms. Ganguly, learned Advocate, is present to represent the petitioner/husband.

Heard both sides. Considering the innocuous prayer and taking note of the fact

that in the matrimonial suit filed by the husband being in the year 2015 seeking divorce

against his wife on ground of cruelty, the opposite party/wife filed an application under

Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act seeking maintenance pendente lite and litigation

cost which has not yet been disposed of. Though Ms. Ganguly tried to impress that let

the main suit along with the Misc. Case be disposed of in expeditious manner, but

considering the submission of the learned Advocate for the opposite party, and,
2

desirability of disposal of the application for maintenance pendente lite earlier, i.e.

before taking up the proceeding of the main suit, so that, by affording the cost of

litigation the wife can engage an Advocate of her own choice for defending herself in

the suit.

However, this court desires to dispose of such innocuous application by giving

certain directions upon the learned trial court, as the matter is pending since 2015. The

C.O. is accordingly disposed of directing the learned trial Judge to take up the hearing

of Misc. Case 31 of 2015 for its expeditious disposal within the period not exceeding

three months from the date of communication of this order which shall be deemed to be

a direction of this court as peremptory in nature.

It is further directed that thereafter subject to exhausting other interlocutory

stages, if any pending learned trial court shall proceed to bring the main suit for divorce

in the peremptory board for its expeditious disposal by fixing the date (s) according to

convenience of the diary of the court without grant of unnecessary adjournment to

either of the parties.

There will be no order as to costs.

Department is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the learned

trial court for information and to act accordingly.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to

the parties on priority basis.

( Mir Dara Sheko, J.)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation