SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sajithakumari vs The State Of Kerala on 28 February, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1941

Crl.MC.No.1119 OF 2020(H)

CC 350/2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,
RAMANKARI

PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:

SAJITHAKUMARI
AGED 29 YEARS,D/O. GOPINATHAN PILLAI,
RESIDING ALEEKALATHIL PUTHIYAVILA MURI,
KANDALLOOR VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY.

BY ADVS.
SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI
DR.SHERINE JOSEPH

RESPONDENTS/STATE AND ACCUSED:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

2 VINODKUMAR
MATHOOR PUTHIYAVEEDU, THOTTUVATHALA P. O.,
NEDUMUDI – 688 501.

3 PADMAVATHIKUNJAMMA
MATHOOR PUTHIYAVEEDU, THOTTUVATHALA P. O.,
NEDUMUDI – 688 501.
Crl.M.C.No.1119 of 2020 2

4 ANILKUMAR
MATHOOR PUTHIYAVEEDU, THOTTUVATHALA P. O.,
NEDUMUDI – 688 501.

5 MINI
W/O. RAJENDRAN NAIR SRAMPICKAL (ROHINI),
KANNADI MURI, PULINKUNNU P. O. – 688 504.

SRI.B.JAYASURYA SR. PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
28.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.1119 of 2020 3

Criminal M.C.No.1119 of 2020
———————————————–
ORDER

This is a proceedings instituted under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the final report in

C.C. No.350 of 2013 on the files of the Court of the Judicial

Magistrate of the first class, Ramankary. The case is one

instituted upon a police report registered for offences under

Sections 420, 406, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code. The petitioner is the de facto complainant in the

case. The accused in the case are the husband, mother-in-law,

sister-in-law and the husband of the sister-in-law respectively of

the de facto complainant. The accusation in the case in essence

is that the accused have subjected the de facto complainant to

cruelty when they were residing together. This Crl.M.C. is filed

stating that the petitioner has settled the dispute with the

accused and she does not want to pursue the matter anymore.
Crl.M.C.No.1119 of 2020 4

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as

also the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Insofar as the offences alleged are offences

punishable under Sections 420, 406, 498A read with Section 34

of the Indian Penal Code, and insofar as the de facto

complainant herself has approached this court for quashing the

proceedings, I deem it appropriate to quash the proceedings.

In the result, the Criminal M.C. is allowed and all

further proceedings in C.C. No.350 of 2013 on the files of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ramankary are quashed.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

YKB
Crl.M.C.No.1119 of 2020 5

APPENDIX
PETITIONER’S/S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.1.2013
IN CMP NO.6624/12 IN CRIME NO.503/12
OF KANAKAKUNNU POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CC NO.350/2013
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT, RAMANKARY FILED BY
THE NEDUMUDY POLICE.

ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.7.2014
IN OP (HMA) NO.1480/2013 OF THE FAMILY
COURT, MAVELIKARA.

ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.11.2019
ORDER IN OP(CRL) NO.106/2014 OF THIS
HON’BLE COURT.

RESPONDENT’S/S EXHIBITS:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation