SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sajurahim vs State Of Kerala on 27 February, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 8TH PHALGUNA,
1941

Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 168/2013 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM

CRIME NO.1810/2012 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION , Kollam

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

1 SAJURAHIM, AGED 34 YEARS
S/O.RAHIMKUTTY, SANO MANZIL, THAZATHUCHERRY,
KOOTTIKADA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT-691020.

2 SANORAHIM, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O.RAHIMKUTTY, SANO MANZIL, THAZATHUCHERRY,
KOOTTIKADA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT-691020.

3 JASMIN, AGED 33 YEARS
W/OSANORAHIM, SANO MANZIL, THAZATHUCHERRY,
KOOTTIKADA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT-691020.

4 NAZIMA, AGED 58 YEARS
D/O.SAINABABEEVI, SANO MANZIL,
THAZATHUCHERRY, KOOTTIKADA.P.O., KOLLAM
DISTRICT-691020.

BY ADV. SRI.UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA-682031.

2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-691011.

3 SREEDEVI, D/O.CHANDRABABU, AGED 33 YEARS,
MANKKUTTHIL HOUSE, THATTAMALA.P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-691020.
Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)

..2..

R3 BY ADV. T.P.PRADEEP
BY SR. PP SRI. AMJAD ALI

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 27.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)

..3..

Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)
————————————–

ORDER

This is a proceedings under Section 482 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure for quashing Annexure – A2 Final Report

pending trial before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,

Kollam in C.C.No. 168 of 2013.

2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in the

said case. The case was one registered under Sections 498A

and 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is seen that the petitioners and the de facto

complainant of the crime have amicably settled the disputes.

An affidavit sworn to by the de facto complainant is part of the

records.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,

the learned Public Prosecutor as also the learned counsel for

the de facto complainant.

5. It is seen that the dispute arose on account of

the matrimonial discord between the de facto complainant and

her husband, the first accused. Though the matter is settled
Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)

..4..

between the parties, I have examined the accusation in the

case and found that this is a matter that could be settled and

closed in the light of the decisions of the Apex Court in

Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi, (2013) 4

SCC 58 and Gian singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC

303, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure.

In the result, the Crl.M.C. is allowed and Annexure –

A2 Final Report pending trial before the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court-II, Kollam in C.C.No. 168 of 2013 and all

further proceedings thereto are quashed.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
ds 28.02.2020
Crl.MC.No.1695 OF 2020(B)

..5..

APPENDIX
PETITIONER’S/S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR WITH COPY OF THE
CMP IN CRIME NO.1810/2012 OF
ERVAIPURAM POLICE.

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME
NO.1810/2012 OF ERVAIPURAM POLICE
WHICH IS NOW PENDING AS CC.NO.168/2013
ON THE FILE OF JFCM-II KOLLAM.

ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
16.4.2013 IN OP(SMA) NO.500/2012.

ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT
OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation