SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Samrat Ray & Ors vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 13 January, 2020

$~55
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 13.01.2020

+ CRL.M.C. 106/2020
SAMRAT RAY ORS ….. Petitioners
Through Mr.Akash Vajpai, Adv. with
Mr.Askhay Ravi, Adv. with
petitioners in person.

versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ANR ….. Respondents
Through Mr.Izhar Ahmed, APP for State.
SI Akash Deep PS Roop Nagar.
Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Adv. for R-2
with R-2 in person.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR

No.267/2018 dated 20.12.2018 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

CRL.M.C.106/2020 Page 1 of 3

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 15.12.2014 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

5. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement

deed dated 05.08.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person with her

counsel and has been identified by SI Akash Deep and submits that matter

has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners

any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.267/2018 dated

20.12.2018 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

CRL.M.C.106/2020 Page 2 of 3

9. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

10. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
JANUARY 13, 2020
ab

CRL.M.C.106/2020 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation