SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 24 March, 2017

CRM No.M-36232 of 2016                                                      [1]




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                       CHANDIGARH

                                   Criminal Misc. No.M- 36232 of 2016(OM)
                                              Date of Decision: March 24 , 2017.

Sandeep Singh                    ...... PETITIONER (s)

            Versus

State of Punjab            ...... RESPONDENT (s)


CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:    Mr. Gurinder Singh Hayer, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

            Ms. Shivali, AAG, Punjab.

            None for respondent No.2.
                                 *****
            1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
               the judgment?
            2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
            3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?
                                 *****

LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.98 dated 06.09.2016 under Sections 406/498A IPC

registered at Police Station Women Cell, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana.

This matter was placed before the Mediation and Conciliation

Centre of this Court to explore the possibility of an amicable resolution of the

dispute. The parties have arrived at an amicable settlement on 16.02.2017.

The terms and conditions reduced into writing are attached with this file. The

parties have decided to part ways. It is informed by learned counsel for the

1 of 2
::: Downloaded on – 26-03-2017 16:34:06 :::
CRM No.M-36232 of 2016 [2]

petitioner that petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has

been filed. Statements of the parties at first motion have since been recorded.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Gurdev

Singh, affirms the factum of settlement between the parties. It is further

verified that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is no longer required

for custodial interrogation. No recovery is to be effected from him.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed. Consequently, order dated 06.10.2016 is made absolute.


                                                        ( LISA GILL )
March 24 , 2017.                                            JUDGE
'om'



                   Whether speaking/reasoned:        Yes/No
                   Whether reportable:               Yes/No




                                    2 of 2
                 ::: Downloaded on - 26-03-2017 16:34:07 :::
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation