SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sandeep Vachaspati Lakheda vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 October, 2019



Sandeep Vachaspati Lakheda …Applicant
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

Mr. Sudeep Pasbola a/w Mr. Karl Rustomkhan i/b Mr. Rahul Arote for the

Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State

PI Ms. Rani Laxman Puri from Vanrai Police Station, Mumbai, is present


P.C. :

1 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2 By this application, the applicant seeks his enlargement on bail

in connection with C.R. No. 110 of 2019 registered with the Vanrai Police

Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 377 of

the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 6 and Section10 of the Protection of

Children from Sexual Offences Act.

3 Perused the papers. The applicant is the father of the child,

aged 6 years. According to the complainant (mother of the victim child and

SQ Pathan 1/6

::: Uploaded on – 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

wife of the applicant), she was married to the applicant on 6 th October

2011. It appears that the complainant left her matrimonial house on 25 th

May 2017 along with the child. On 20th June 2017, the complainant

instituted divorce proceedings as against the applicant in the Family Court

and on 28th January 2018, the complainant lodged an FIR alleging offences

punishable under Sections 498A, Section323, Section504, Section506, Section34 of the Indian Penal

Code as against the applicant and the in-laws. It appears that the applicant

and the complainant filed Consent Terms in the Family Court on 16 th

August 2018. According to the Consent Terms, the complainant had agreed

to give access of the minor son to the applicant once a month for one hour

i.e. on the 3rd Saturday in the Children’s Complex, Family Court, Bandra

between 3:00 p.m to 4:00 p.m. The complainant had also agreed to give

access of his son on 4th September 2018 between 3:00 p.m to 4:00 p.m, at

Oberoi Mall on the son’s birthday. The complainant has stated that

pursuant to the Consent Terms, she took child to the Children’s Complex at

Family Court on 1st September 2018 to meet the applicant, however, the

child started crying and hence, she took the child back home. She has

further stated that as per the Consent Terms, she took her son to meet the

applicant to Oberoi Mall on 4th September 2018, however, as the son was

not willing to meet the applicant and started crying, they did not meet the

applicant. According to the complainant, the child would wake up in the

SQ Pathan 2/6

::: Uploaded on – 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

night and start crying, saying that he does not want to meet the applicant

and that he should not be taken to the Court. She has stated that pursuant

thereto, she took the son for counselling at Urja Counselling and Remedial

Centre. She has stated that after two sessions were over with one

Dr. Parekh, she disclosed that her son had disclosed to her that the applicant

had inserted a stick in his anus, as a result of which, he had sustained a

bleeding injury. According to the child, the applicant had inserted a stick in

his anus as a punishment for his mischief, when he was staying with him.

The child allegedly disclosed to the Counsellor that he did not disclose the

same to any person as he was scared of his father. The complainant has

further alleged that when she was staying with the applicant’s parents, the

applicant’s father also would inappropriately touch the child and that the

same was disclosed to her by her son. Pursuant to the aforesaid, the

complainant lodged a complaint on 5th June 2019 as against the applicant

and the applicant’s father. Learned counsel for the applicant states that no

date, month or year has been mentioned when the alleged incident took

place. He submits that the complainant had left the matrimonial house in

May 2017 and as such, the applicant had no access to the child since then.

He further submits that because of the matrimonial dispute between the

applicant and the complainant, a false complaint has been lodged as against

the applicant and his father.

SQ Pathan 3/6

::: Uploaded on – 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

4 Learned A.P.P states that the statement of the child aged 6

years, both recorded under Sections 164 and Section161 are consistent with each

other. She further submits that the said fact came to light when the child

was sent to a Counsellor. Pursuant to the complaint, the child was sent for

medical examination. Prima facie, the medical papers do not support the

allegations. According to the final opinion, since the incident had taken

place two years prior, there were no signs of use of force.

5 Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, states that

the applicant will not seek the custody of the child till the conclusion of the

case. Statement accepted.

6 Whether the allegations are true or not, is a matter, which will

be decided by the trial Court. The applicant is in custody since 2 nd July

2019. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet is filed.

7 Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed on the

following terms and conditions :


(i) The applicant be released on cash bail in the sum of

Rs. 20,000/-, for a period of six weeks;

SQ Pathan 4/6

::: Uploaded on – 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

(ii) The applicant shall within the said period of six weeks, furnish

P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one or two sureties in the

like amount;

(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to

influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person

concerned with the case;

(iv) The applicant shall not seek custody/access of the child, till the

completion of the trial;

(v) The applicant shall inform his latest place of residence and

mobile contact number and/or change of residence or mobile details,

if any, from time to time to the Court seized of the matter and to the

Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station;

(vi) The applicant to cooperate with the conduct of the trial and

attend all the dates before the trial Court, unless exempted.

8 The application is accordingly disposed of.

SQ Pathan                                                                                             5/6

::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

9 It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima

facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in

accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

10 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.


SQ Pathan                                                                                            6/6

::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019 16/10/2019 00:52:41 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation