SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sandeep vs State Of Haryana on 26 August, 2019

CRM-M-27667-2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-27667 of 2019 (OM)
Date of Decision: August 26, 2019

Sandeep
……….PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana
……..RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present: Mr. Lajpat Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG Haryana

*******

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of

Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.

100 dated 13.07.2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

323, Section377, Section506 of Indian Penal Code (for short-SectionIPC) and 4 of Prevention of

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short-POCSO Act), at Police

Station Rajaund, District Kaithal.

Heard.

Report of Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal received.

Petitioner has been charge-sheeted for the offences punishable

under Sections 323, Section377, Section506 IPC and 4 of POCSO Act, 2012. In view of

statement of Dr. Dinesh Kumar PW10, the trial Court will be required to

look into the attending circumstances as to whether the offences punishable

1 of 2
01-09-2019 23:43:52 :::
CRM-M-27667-2019 -2-

under Sections 377 IPC and 4 of POCSO Act are disclosed.

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the

present petition is allowed. Petitioner Sandeep is ordered to be released on

regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of

concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following

terms:-

a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in
Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit
of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The
trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety
bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with
law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for
bail afresh.

c. He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the
Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA )
August 26, 2019 JUDGE
Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

Whether Reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
01-09-2019 23:43:52 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation