C.R.M.11717 of 2018
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17/12/2018 in
connection with Tahatta P.S. Case No.422 of 2018 dated
08/12/2018 under Sections 498A/307/406/34 of the Indian
In the matter of: Sanjay Biswas Ors.
Mr. Asraf Mandal
…for the petitioners.
Mr. Sandip Chakraborty
…for the State.
The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Tahatta P.S.
Case No.422 of 2018 dated 08/12/2018 under Sections 498A/307/406/34 of
the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioners claim that following a misunderstanding with the first
petitioner, his wife left the matrimonial home; but has now brought imaginary
charges against the petitioners.
The State says that the wife has been constrained to leave the
matrimonial home along with her two minor children.
The first petitioner offers to pay maintenance to the extent of
Rs.8,000/- per month for the wife and children. The first petitioner should
immediately make the payment for the month of January, 2019 by the end of
this month and continue to make subsequent payments in similar manner.
In the event the first petitioner does not make payment for any
month, the wife will be entitled to seek the immediate cancellation of bail.
In the event the wife is awarded any alimony pendente lite or
maintenance or the like by any other appropriate forum, the payments made
in terms of this order will be adjusted against the same.
Subject to the above, in the event of arrest, the petitioners are
directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five
Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the
Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In addition, the petitioners will also report
to the Investigating Officer at such time and place as may be specified by the
concerned police officer.
The investigating officer is directed to accompany the wife to the
matrimonial home to seize the stridhan articles and make over the same to
the complainant upon obtaining a valid receipt. If the first petitioner claims
that most of the stridhan articles have been taken away by the wife during her
departure from the matrimonial home, an adverse inference may be drawn
against the petitioners and the wife will be entitled to seek cancellation.
The petition for anticipatory bail is allowed on the conditions
A certified copy of this order be immediately made available to the
petitioners, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Sanjib Banerjee, J.)
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)