SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sanjay Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 8 May, 2018


Criminal Misc. No. M- 8637 of 2018 (OM)
Date of decision : May 08, 2018

Sanjay Kumar …..Petitioner

State of Haryana ….Respondent


Present: Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 52 dated 25.01.2018 under Sections 498A, 323, 354A

(2), 377, 34 IPC registered at Police Station City Bhiwani.

Contentions on behalf of the petitioner, while issuing notice of

motion, read as under:-

” The petitioner, it is submitted, is the uncle (Chacha) of
the complainant’s husband. He has been falsely implicated for
the reason that he is a government employee. Absolutely false
allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. The
petitioner is living separately from the complainant and her
husband and has nothing to do with the matrimonial discord
between them.”

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has joined investigation pursuant to interim order passed by this Court.

Final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been presented. The petitioner

undertakes to face the proceedings and not abuse the concession of

anticipatory bail, if confirmed. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be


1 of 2
13-05-2018 10:41:24 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 8637 of 2018 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Praveen

Kumar, verifies that the petitioner has joined investigation. Final report

under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has since been presented. The petitioner is not

involved in any other criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 28.02.2018

is made absolute.

It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above

are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the


(Lisa Gill)
May 08, 2018 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
13-05-2018 10:41:25 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation