SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sanjay S/O. Dnyandeo Ranpise vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 September, 2018

12-IGP22-18.DOC

Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INDIAN GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO. 22 OF 2018

Sanjay S/o Dnyandeo Ranpise …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

Mr Anand Mishra, I/b AM Saraogi, for the Petitioner.
Smt Jyoti Chavan, AGP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J
DATED: 5th September 2018
PC:-

1. Leave to amend to correct the typographical error in
paragraph 4 of the Petition.

2. The application is under Section 7 of the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890 to appoint the Petitioner Sanjay as a guardian of
Harshavardhan Sanjay Jagtap, aged 13 years and Ms Swara Sanjay
Jagtap, also 13 years. Both children are twins born to one Dr Sanjay
A Jagtap (“Dr Jagtap”) and Mansi Jagtap. The Petitioner, Sanjay, is
Mansi’s brother and, therefore, the maternal uncle of the children.
Dr Jagtap’s own parents died before him. Dr Jagtap died on 11th
October 2014. Manasi was unwell, suffering from renal failure, and
died on 22nd May 2018.

Page 1 of 2

5th September 2018

::: Uploaded on – 05/09/2018 06/09/2018 02:08:38 :::
12-IGP22-18.DOC

3. Sanjay says that the two minors are living in his house and
have been cared for by him. He has an income of about Rs. 1.3 lakhs
per month. He has no interest adverse to that of the minors.

4. In my view, an order will be necessary not only in the interest
of the minors but particularly also for their future education, for
production before the authorities and so on.

5. There is no need to order issuance of notice under Section 11
of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890.

6. In these circumstances, the Petition is made absolute in terms
of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

(G. S. PATEL, J)

Page 2 of 2
5th September 2018

::: Uploaded on – 05/09/2018 06/09/2018 02:08:38 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation