SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sanjay Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 18 July, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.38677 of 2017
Date of decision: 18th July, 2019

Sanjay Sharma others
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ripudaman, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana
for the respondent No.1/State.
None for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 18.09.2018 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial

Magistrate, Sohna, Gurugram has been received whereby after recording

statements of complainant Sharmila and the accused persons, namely

Rajni, Sanjay Sharma and Sumit Sharma, the Court has shown its

satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of

free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or

pressure.

Learned counsel for the accused/petitioners have made

statement that as per instructions received, the parties had given final

effect to their agreement settlement/compromise and that nothing is due

towards anyone on account of this settlement and that the final effect be

given to this petition.

1 of 2
25-08-2019 15:32:13 :::
CRM-M No.38677 of 2017 2

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.228 dated 16.07.2010 under Sections 498A, Section406, Section323, Section506 IPC

pertaining to Police Station Sohna, District Gurugram and all

consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
July 18, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
25-08-2019 15:32:14 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation