C.R.M. 528 of 2020
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 24.12.2019 in connection
with Sabang P.S. Case No.392 of 2019 dated 04.09.2019 under
Sections 498A/323/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the matter of : Sanku Bankura.
Mr. Triptimoy Talukder,
Mr. Dipanjan Chatterjee,
Mr. A. Tarafdar,
Mr. Swapan Bhattacharyya.
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sonali Das.
…..for the State.
Mr. Provas Bhattacharyya,
Mr. Dilip Kr. Sadhu.
…for the de-facto complainant.
Liberty is given to the learned Advocate-on-record of the
petitioners to correct the cause title of the petition.
Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in the instant case due to matrimonial discord.
Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer
for anticipatory bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant
also opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the
petitioner has married for the second time.
Having considered the materials on record and bearing in
mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations, we are of the
opinion though custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not
necessary, he requires to co-operate with the investigation in
accordance with law.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the
petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of
Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the
satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the
trial court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date
and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the
investigating officer once in a week until further orders.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Suvra Ghosh,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)