SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sanku Bankura vs Unknown on 15 January, 2020

1

15.01.2020

.

68.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 528 of 2020

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 24.12.2019 in connection
with Sabang P.S. Case No.392 of 2019 dated 04.09.2019 under
Sections 498A/323/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Sanku Bankura.

… Petitioner.

Mr. Triptimoy Talukder,
Mr. Dipanjan Chatterjee,
Mr. A. Tarafdar,
Mr. Swapan Bhattacharyya.

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Sonali Das.

…..for the State.

Mr. Provas Bhattacharyya,
Mr. Dilip Kr. Sadhu.

…for the de-facto complainant.

Liberty is given to the learned Advocate-on-record of the

petitioners to correct the cause title of the petition.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been

falsely implicated in the instant case due to matrimonial discord.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

2

Learned Advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant

also opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the

petitioner has married for the second time.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations, we are of the

opinion though custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not

necessary, he requires to co-operate with the investigation in

accordance with law.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as

laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the

trial court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date

and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the

investigating officer once in a week until further orders.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation