SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Santhosh Kumar vs The Station House Officer on 3 June, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1941

BAIL APPL.NO. 3457 OF 2019

CRIME NO. 131/2019 OF MEENANGADI POLICE STATION , WAYANAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS,
S/O. RAJAGOPALAN, PALATH VEEDU,
KRISHNAGIRI P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT STATE:

1 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
MEENANGADI POLICE STATION, WAYANAD DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2 SMT. SIJIMOL AGED 38 YEARS
W/O. SANTHOSH, D/O. SREEDHARAN,
RESIDING AT PALATH VEEDU, KRISHNAGIRI P.O,
SULTHAN BATHERI, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673593.

3 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
———————————
B.A. No. 3457 of 2019
———————————
Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2019

ORDER

The petitioner has been arrayed as the sole accused in Crime

No.131/2019 of Meenangadi Police Station, which has been

registered for offences punishable under Secs.498A, 324, 506

294(b) of the SectionIPC.

2. The prosecution case in short is that, the petitioner is

the husband of the lady defacto complainant, and that two

children were born in the said wedlock, and that some time after

their marriage, there arose matrimonial disputes and the 2 nd

respondent had claimed maintenance from the petitioner, and

alleged that the petitioner had demanded dowry from the 2nd

petitioner, and that on 15.4.2019, he had consumed liquor and

assaulted her and that he had used abusive words against her, etc.

It is pointed out that now the disputes between the petitioner and

the 2nd respondent lady defacto complainant have been settled,

and that they are living together, etc.

3. Taking note of the nature of the allegations disclosed

against the petitioner in this case, it is ordered in the interest of
B.A. No. 3457 / 2019

..3..

justice that, in the event of the petitioner being arrested by police

in connection with the abovesaid crime, he shall be released on bail

on his executing bond for Rs.40,000/- and on his furnishing two

solvent sureties for the like sum, each to the satisfaction of the

Investigating Officer concerned.

4. However the grant of bail will be subject to following
conditions:-

i. The petitioner shall not involve in any criminal offences of
similar nature.

ii. The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation.
iii. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as
and when required in that connection.

iv. The petitioner shall not influence witness or shall not tamper
or attempt to tamper evidence in any manner, whatsoever.

If there is any violation of the abovesaid conditions by the

petitioner, then the jurisdictional court concerned stand hereby

empowered, to consider the plea for cancellation of bail at the

appropriate time.

With these observations and directions, the above

Anticipatory Bail Application will stand disposed.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
JUDGE
MMG

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation