CRM-M-3986 of 2017 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
1. CRM-M-3986 of 2017
Date of Decision: 17.04.2017
Satinderpal Singh ….Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ….Respondent
2. CRM-M-4943 of 2017
Karamjit Singh and others ….Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab ….Respondent
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. K.S. Sidhu , Advocate
for petitioners in both the petitions.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocate
for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate
for the complainant.
*******
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of
Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners in case FIR
No. 11 dated 18.01.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section
406 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC‘), at Police Station Patran, District
Patiala.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he has
instructions to submit that parties have amicably settled the dispute
pertaining to FIR in question and other matters pending between the parties.
1 of 2
22-04-2017 00:03:58 :::
CRM-M-3986 of 2017 -2-
Learned State counsel also submits that parties have given copy
of compromise to the Investigating Officer and the offence punishable
under Section 406 IPC is compoundable. She further submits that
petitioners have joined the investigation under orders dated 08.02.2017 and
16.02.2017 passed in respective petitions and their custodial interrogation is
no more required.
In view of above but without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and orders dated 08.02.2017
and 16.02.2017 passed in respective petitions are made absolute till the
presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:-
(i) that petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation by the police as and when required;
(ii) that petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted
with the facts of the accusation against them so as to
dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or
to any police officer;
(iii) that petitioners shall not leave India without the prior
permission of the Court.
(iv) that petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation
of challan in Court.
April 17, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA )
jk JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
22-04-2017 00:04:00 :::