SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Satvinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 10 July, 2017

CRM No.M-43019 of 2016(OM) [1]


Criminal Misc. No.M- 43019 of 2016(OM)
Date of Decision: July 10 , 2017.

Satvinder Singh …… PETITIONER (s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. S.K.Gupta, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.22 dated 13.09.2016 under Sections 406/498A IPC

registered at Police Station Women, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.

1 of 2
15-07-2017 23:33:08 :::
CRM No.M-43019 of 2016(OM) [2]

Though mediation between the parties . failed, the petitioner and

respondent No.2 have ultimately resolved their dispute amicably. They have

decided to part ways. The terms and conditions of settlement have been reduced

into writing. The settlement dated 10.07.2017, filed in Court today, is taken on

record subject to just exceptions.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that in view of the

settlement arrived at between the parties, he has no objection to the grant of

anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the strict adherence to the terms and

conditions of the settlement by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Talwinder

Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, specifically

the settlement arrived at between the parties but without commenting upon or

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed.

Consequently, order dated 02.12.2016 is made absolute.

Liberty is however afforded to respondent No.2 to move an

appropriate application, in case the petitioner does not adhere to the terms and

conditions of the settlement.

July 10 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
15-07-2017 23:33:10 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation