SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Satyam Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 12 April, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23053 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2019 Thana- KADAMKUAN District-
Patna

SATYAM KUMAR JHA, aged about 24 years, male, S/o Nand Kishor Jha
Resident of C/o A.K. Mishra Rajendra Nagar, Patna Road No.6, P.S-
Kadamkuan, District-Patna.

… … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar

… … Opposite Party

Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocte.
For the Opposite Party: APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER

2 12-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences
alleged under Sections 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code
registered in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 38 of
2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely
implicated and the informant is none other than the petitioner’s
wife and as such the accusations under Section 354 IPC are
unlikely. The F.I.R. has been instituted in retaliation to the
petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the petitioner in
Matrimonial Case No. 1376 of 2017. The petitioner is accused in
one prior case of different nature in which he is on bail.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s
arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from
the date of communication of this order, let the above named
petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23053 of 2019(2) dt.12-04-2019
2/2

Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each
to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge VII cum A.C.J.M., Patna, in
connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 38 of 2019, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and
also subject to the following further conditions –

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of
the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar
offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the
investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself
available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State
shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present
in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of
failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his
bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court
concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-

U T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation