SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Satyapal Singh vs State Of U.P. on 3 April, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 68

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 13774 of 2019

Applicant :- Satyapal Singh

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Yadav

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Bachchoo Lal,J.

Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the name of applicant in the memo of bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no direct evidence against the applicant. There was no dispute of demand of dowry. The applicant has not harassed or tortured to the deceased. There is general allegation against the applicant. No specific role has been assigned to him. There is no dying declaration of the deceased. The deceased herself set her on fire. The husband of deceased took her to hospital to save her life. At the time of alleged incident the applicant was not present in the village. When he came back on the next day he came to know about the incident. It has further been submitted that the applicant was living separate from the deceased and her husband. He has no concern with the alleged incident. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 27.1.2019.

Per contra; learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Satya Pal Singh involved in Case Crime No. 774 of 2018, under section 498A, 304B, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Civil Lines, District Budaun be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

2. He shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and shall cooperate with the trial.

3. He shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.

In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.

Order Date :- 3.4.2019

Masarrat

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation