SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Savitaben Maheshbhai Baldaniya vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 27 March, 2017

              R/SCR.A/2246/2017                                                   ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


              SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION - TO LODGE
                              FIR/COMPLAINT) NO. 2246 of 2017

         ==========================================================
                    SAVITABEN MAHESHBHAI BALDANIYA....Applicant(s)
                                      Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT  2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR. KALRAV R PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         BHAVESH C PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MS NISHA THAKORE, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

                                     Date : 27/03/2017


                                       ORAL ORDER

By this writ-application under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the applicant has a grievance to redress
as regards the inaction on the part of the police authority in
not registering the First Information Report pursuant to the
complaint lodged by her in writing dated 9th August 2016
addressed to the Police Commissioner, Surat city, for the
offence punishable under Sections 498A, 313, 315, 316, 120B,
504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

The Police Inspector, Punagam Police Station, Surat, is
directed to take into consideration the complaint filed by the
petitioner in writing (Annexure-A to this petition) and after
going through the same, take a decision, whether the same

Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Mar 28 00:26:45 IST 2017
R/SCR.A/2246/2017 ORDER

discloses commission of a cognizable offence or not. After
taking into consideration the complaint and other materials, if
any, the Police Inspector is of the view that the same discloses
commission of a cognizable offence, then appropriate
directions be issued for registration of the FIR forthwith at the
concerned Police Station. However, the Police Inspector, after
going through the materials, is of the view that no case is
made out for registration of the FIR, then in such
circumstances, he shall inform the petitioner in writing about
the same by assigning reasons in brief, within a period of four
weeks from today.

With the above observations and directions, this petition
is disposed of. I clarify that I have otherwise not gone into the
merits of the matter.

For any reason, if the police authorities refuse to register
the FIR, it shall be open for the petitioner to avail of the
remedy under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Direct service is permitted.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)
MOIN

Page 2 of 2

HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Mar 28 00:26:45 IST 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation