SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sections 3/4 Of The Dowry … vs In Re: Mithu Samanta & Ors on 20 December, 2019

1

20.12.19

Sl. No.96
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 12152 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 19.12.2019 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 654 of
2019 dated 30.10.2019 under Sections 498A/Section302/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Sections 3/Section4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

And
In Re: Mithu Samanta Ors.

… … Petitioners
Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee .. Ld. Public Prosecutor
Mr. Aniket Mitra .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in the in-laws of the

victim-housewife and they have been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and opposes

the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record including the statement of the victim-

housewife recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the medical

documents which prima facie indicate that the victim-housewife suffered accidental burn

injury, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioners may not

be necessary in the facts of the present case and they may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners,

namely (1) Mithu Samanta, (2) Sambhu Samanta, (3) Budhhadeb Samanta (4)

Bholanath Samanta, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
2

Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that they shall appear

before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation