1

27.11.2019
72

sdas
allowed

C.R.M. No. 11077 of 2019

In Re.: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
26.11.2019 in connection with Murshidabad Police Station Case No. 323 of 2019 dated 17.07.2019 under
Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And

In Re: Sudhansu Das Ors. ….. petitioners

Ms. Sreyashee Biswas,
Ms. Benajir Hasna
…..for the petitioners

Mr. S. S. Imam,
Mr. Arabinda Manna
….for the State

It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners

that the victim suffered accidental burns and her husband attempted to

save her. Petitioners no. 1 and 2 are the parents-in-law of the victim

housewife and petitioner no. 3 is the match maker.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the

nature of allegations in the light of the aforesaid submission made on

behalf of the petitioners relating to accidental burns which finds

corroboration from the endorsement made in the medical papers and the

statements of witnesses, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them.
2

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall

be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two

sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that they shall

appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within a period of

four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)