SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sections 498A/307/34 Of The … vs In Re: Umbar Mondal & Ors on 12 September, 2019

1

12.09.2019
105

sdas
partly
allowed

C.R.M. No. 8270 of 2019

In Re.: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 06.09.2019 in connection with
Taherpur Police Station Case No. 192 of 2019 dated 22.08.2019 under
Sections 498A/Section307/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In Re: Umbar Mondal Ors. ….. petitioners

Mr. Debarshi Brahma
…..for the petitioners

Mr. Arijit Ganguly,
Mr. Avik Ghatak
….for the State

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that

petitioner no 3 has already been arrested.

Hence, application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not

pressed so far as petitioner no. 3 is concerned.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind

the extent of complicity of the petitioners no. 1, 2 and 4 i.e. the in-laws

of the victim housewife in the alleged crime and as the principal

accused i.e. the husband has been released on regular bail, we are

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners

no. 1,2 and 4 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the
2

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and on condition that the petitioners no. 1,2 and 4 shall appear

before the court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four

weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed so far as

petitioners no. 1,2 and 4 are concerned.

(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation