SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sh. Harvinder Pal & Ors. vs State & Ors. on 11 September, 2019

$~25
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 11.09.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 4287/2019
SH. HARVINDER PAL ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE ORS. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Vinay,
PS Anand Parbat.
Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate
for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby

quashing FIR No. 182/2013 dated 24.09.2013, registered at PS -Anand

Parbat for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC

and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioners and respondent no.2 got married on 22.06.2008 as per

Hindu rites and rituals.

CRL.M.C. 4287/2019 Page 1 of 2

5. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement

deed dated 05.05.2017. They had started living together as husband and wife

happily and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The respondent No. 2/complainant is present in person with her

counsel and has been identified by SI Vinay of Police Station Anand Parbat

and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute

the matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 182/2013 dated

24.09.2013 registered at Police Station Anand Parbat instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings therefrom are quashed.

9. The petition is allowed accordingly.

10. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 11, 2019
yo

CRL.M.C. 4287/2019 Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation