SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sh. Shubham Bhatt & Ors vs State & Anr. on 23 September, 2019

$~66
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 23rd September, 2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4809/2019

SH. SHUBHAM BHATT ORS …..Petitioners
Through: Ms. Vaghisha Kochar, Advocate

versus

STATE ANR. …..Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with
SI Sumit Kumar, PS Ranjit Nagar

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

JUDGMENT

(ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby

quashing FIR No. 332 dated 26th July, 2016, registered at PS Ranjit Nagar

for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and

consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no. 2

and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is

taken up for final disposal.

CRL.M.C.4809/2019 Page 1 of 3

4. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 got married on 20th April, 2012 as

per Hindu rites and rituals.

5. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have with the intervention of

their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement by

mutual consent. They had started living together as husband and wife

happily and settled all their disputes amicably.

6. The respondent no. 2/complainant is present in person in the Court

and has been identified by SI Sumit Kumar of Police Station Ranjit Nagar

and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute

the matter any further.

7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 332 dated 26th July, 2016,

registered at PS Ranjit Nagar instituted for the offences punishable under

Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings emanating

therefrom are quashed.

9. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and disposed of.

CRL.M.C.4809/2019 Page 2 of 3

10. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
SEPTEMEBR 23, 2019
v

CRL.M.C.4809/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation