IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
.
Cr.MP(M) No. 2085 of 2019
Reserved on : November 29 , 2019
Date of Decision: December 6 , 2019
Shakuntla Devi …Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the respondent : M/s. Anil Jaswal, Ashwani K. Sharma and Nand
Lal Thakur, Additional Advocates General for
the respondent/State.
Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Upon arrest as a member of an unlawful cohort of orthodox
villagers, who in furtherance of common object, smeared soot on
the face of an old lady, garlanded her with shoes, broke her house-
hold articles along with idols of worship, on the superstition that she
indulged in witchcraft, and also smeared soot on her middle-aged
daughter, who came to her rescue, the accused has come up before
this Court, seeking regular bail.
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP
2
2. The gist of the facts, apposite to adjudicate the present bail
petition, traces its origin to the complaint dated Nov 9, 2019, scribed
.
by Shri Ajay Kumar, a practicing Advocate. He informed the SHO of
Police Station Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P., that his mother-in-law is
an old lady, and has two daughters. On Oct 17, 2019, the villagers
misbehaved with her. Again, on Oct 29, 2019, villagers gathered and
arrived at her house, broke open the doors, and threw away all the
articles, including idols of worship. He stated that even on that date,
he had made a complaint. He further mentioned that on Nov 6,
2019, the ladies and boys of the village administered beatings to his
mother-in-law and sister-in-law. They also smeared their faces with
soot and garlanded his mother-in-law with a string of shoes. They
also made videography of all these acts and posted it on social
media. After that, he named the accused persons and sought their
prosecution.
3. Based on this information, Police Station Sarkaghat, Distt.
Mandi, registered in its file, FIR No. 184 of 2019, dated 9.11.2019,
for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, Section149,
Section454, Section455, Section435, Section354, Section355, Section427, Section504, Section506, Section508, Section323, Section500, Section380,
Section201,Section120B of IPC. The Police swiftly arrested the accused. As per the
statement of Shri Nand Lal Thakur, Additional Advocate General for
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP
3
the State of Himachal Pradesh, the investigation is going on under
the active supervision of the police officials of the highest ranks.
.
4. This Court has granted bail to one of the accused namely
Bimla Devi in Cr.MP(M) No. 2070 of 2019, vide a detailed and
reasoned order. Applying the same reasoning, in my considered
opinion, the judicial custody of the petitioner/accused is not going to
serve any purpose whatsoever, and I am inclined to grant bail on the
following grounds, but subject to stringent conditions:
(a) In the status report the Prosecution has alleged
against the present bail petitioner Shakuntla Devi that she
is involved in all offences except under Section 354 IPC,
and that she was the one who had smeared soot on theface of victim.
(b) As per the Sections mentioned in FIR, the maximum
sentence is of ten years of imprisonment, under Section455 of IPC, which relates to lurking house-trespass, after
preparation made for causing hurt, assault. Since no
offence prescribes sentence for twenty years or life, assuch, there would be different parameters to consider the
plea of bail.
(c) The investigation is almost at the final stages of
completion.
(d) The petitioner/accused is in judicial custody since Nov
10, 2019.
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP
4
(e) The petitioner is a permanent resident of the address
mentioned in the memo of parties, as such presence can.
always be secured.
(f) The petitioner has no criminal history.
5. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. The
petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in the present case, in
connection with the FIR mentioned above, on her furnishing
personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with
two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial
Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Addnl. Chief Judicial Magistrate or
any Judicial Magistrate of District Mandi, HP.
6. The Court executing the personal and surety bonds shall
ascertain the identity of the bail-petitioner, her family members, and
of sureties, through AADHAR Card, Pan Card, Ration Card, etc. The
petitioner shall mention phone numbers and other details, on the
reverse page of the bonds.
7. The Counsel for the accused and the attesting official shall
explain all conditions of this bail to the petitioner.
8. This Court is granting the bail, subject to the conditions
mentioned herein. The petitioner/accused undertakes to comply with
all directions given in this order, and the furnishing of bail bonds by
the petitioner/accused is acceptance of all such conditions:
a) The petitioner undertakes to attend the trial.
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP
5
b) The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when
called by the Investigating Officer. However, whenever the
.
investigation takes place within the boundaries of the
Police Station or the Police Post, then the accused shall
not be called before 9 AM and shall be let off before 5 PM.
c) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation.
d) The petitioner shall not hamper the investigation.
e) The petitioner undertakes not to threaten or browbeat
or use any pressure tactics on the victims, complainant,
and witnesses,
f) The petitioner shall neither influence nor try to control
the investigating officer, in any manner whatsoever.
g) The petitioner undertakes not to make any inducement
threat or promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating
officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the case
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or
any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
h) In case the petitioner commits any offence prescribing
the sentence of imprisonment of more than three years,
within thirty days of knowledge of such FIR, the petitioner
shall intimate SHO of the present police station, with all the
details of the present FIR as well as the new FIR. In such
a situation, it shall be open for the State to apply to this
Court for cancellation of this bail, if it deems fit and proper.
i) Within 30 days from today, the petitioner shall sell, or
surrender, all firearms along with ammunition, and arms
licenses, if any, to the authority which had given such
permission.
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP
6
j) The Petitioner shall not enter within a radius of five
kilometers of the residence of both the victims, measuring
.
from the shortest route, until the recording of the
statements of all witnesses, except Police officials, during
trial. In case the petitioner needs modification of this
condition, then she may apply to this Court, supported with
written permission from the victim, obtained through
Pradhan, Up Pradhan, or Ward Member of the Panchayat,
where the victim resides.
9. The present bail order is only for the FIR mentioned above. It
shall not be construed to be a blanket order of bail in all other cases,
if any, registered against the petitioner.
10. Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of
opinion on the merits of the case, nor shall the trial Court advert to
these comments.
11. The SHO/Additional SHO of the concerned Police Station or
the Investigating Officer to handover a copy of this order to the
victims and explain it to them.
Petition stands allowed in the terms mentioned above.
Copy dasti.
(Anoop Chitkara),
Judge.
December 6 , 2019 (PK)
06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP