SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sharda Parmar vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another on 15 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 1125 of 2012
(U/s 482 Cr.P.C.)

Sharda Parmar ….. Applicant
Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another ….Respondents

Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr. J.S. Virk, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.

The applicant has filed the present
application under
Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘
Cr.P.C’)
for setting aside the summoning order dated
06.04.2012 passed by the Judicial Magistrate,
Kashipur in Criminal Complaint Case No.24 of 2012
(
Mahendra Kumar Chauhan vs Smt. Sharda Parmar)
along with the entire proceedings of the aforesaid
criminal case.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and
perused the record.

2A. Factual Matrix of the case is that respondent
no.2 instituted a complaint case before the J.M.
Kashipur alleging therein that his daughter was
married with Nitin Parmar (son of present applicant) on
01.11.2006. It is alleged that, in the marriage,
sufficient dowry items for domestic use with gold
articles along with Rs.3.00 lakh in cash were given.
Out of that wedlock, a male child was born on
6.1.2009. It is also alleged that Nitin Parmar along with
2

his girlfriend committed the murder of Alpana
Chauhan (daughter of respondent no.2) on 10.3.2010,
and both the accused are languishing in jail. It is
further alleged that after the death of daughter of
respondent no.2, all the Stridhan given by her parents
was taken away by Nitin Parmar from Haldwani to
Agra. However, in spite of repeated requests, the
applicant did not return the above Stridhan.

3. After registration of complaint, learned
Magistrate recorded the statement of complainant
Mahendra Chauhan under
Section 200 Cr.P.C. The
statements of witnesses Pankaj Sharma (CW1) and
Sunil Gupta (CW2) were also recorded under
Section
202 Cr.P.C. After perusal of the evidence, learned
Magistrate summoned the applicant to face trial under
Section 406 IPC. Aggrieved by the said order, the
present application has been filed seeking the aforesaid
prayers.

4. During the course of arguments, it is
informed by learned Counsel for the parties that the
criminal case regarding the murder of daughter of
respondent no.2 resulted in the conviction of Nitin
Parmar and his girlfriend, which attained finality up to
the Hon’ble Apex Court.

5. Now, as far as summoning of the applicant
is concerned, the complainant in his statement u/s
200
Cr.P.C. has categorically stated that sufficient
dowry was given at the time of marriage of his
daughter. He further deposed that Nitin Parmar along
with his girlfriend committed the murder of his
daughter. After his daughter’s death, Nitin Parmar
3

took away all the Stridhan from Haldwani to Agra. The
same statements were given by CW1 Pankaj Sharma
and CW2 Sunil Gupta.

6. On a perusal of the statements of the
witnesses, I am of the view that a prima facie case is
made out against the present applicant under
Section
406 IPC. The Court also finds that no irregularity or
irregularity was committed by the Court below while
summoning the applicant to face trial under
Section
406 IPC.

7. In view of the foregoing facts of the case, the
present petition is devoid of any merit and it is,
accordingly, dismissed. Interim order dated
15.10.2012 is vacated.

8. As the complaint case is pending since 2011,
the Trial Court is directed to decide the complaint case
at the earliest possible, preferably within six months,
from the date of production of a certified copy of this
judgment.

9. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the
Court below for forthwith compliance.

(R.C. Khulbe, J.)
15.03.2019
R.Dang

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh