SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shashikant Tiwari vs The State Of Bihar on 4 November, 2019


Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHUA District-
Kaimur (Bhabua)

SHASHIKANT TIWARI Son of Late Yamuna Tiwari Resident of Village-
Parasiya, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

… … Petitioner
The State of Bihar

… … Opposite Party

Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party: Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP


2 04-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences
alleged under Sections 341, Section323, Section354, Section307, Section34 of the Indian Penal
Code registered in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 508 of

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely
implicated in the backdrop of drainage dispute between the
parties who are agnates and neighbours. It is submitted that the
accusation of assault on the informant’s wife and daughter are
general and omnibus against all three accused persons without
any specific assault attributed to them individually. As a matter of
fact the grievous injury suffered by the informant’s wife resulted
from falling in the drain which led to the dispute. In any event
such injury is on non vital part of the body. There is no
accusation whatsoever to attract the offence under Section 354
IPC which has been added is mere embellishment. The petitioner
claims clean antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65913 of 2019(2) dt.04-11-2019

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s
arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from
the date of communication of this order, let the above named
petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each
to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur
(Bhabua) in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 508 of 2019,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2)
SectionCr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions –

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of
the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar
offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the
investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself
available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State
shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present
in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of
failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his
bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court

(Vikash Jain, J)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation