SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shivam Verma vs State Of Punjab on 30 May, 2017

213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. M- No. 7393 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : May 30, 2017

Shivam Verma …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. Gursimran Singh Bawa, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Deep Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate
for the complainant.

***
LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 60 dated 11.10.2016 registered under Sections 498A,

406 IPC at Police Station Women Amritsar, District Amritsar City.

It is submitted that during the pendency of this petition, the

matter has been amicably resolved between the parties before the Mediation

and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 01.05.2017. The petitioner and the

complainant have decided to part ways. It is, thus, prayed that this petition

be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in view of the

settlement the complainant has no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail

to the petitioner.

1 of 2
09-06-2017 19:32:57 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 7393 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, from ASI

Resham Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation. He is not

required for custodial interrogation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 06.03.2017

is made absolute.

Liberty is afforded to the complainant to move an appropriate

application in case the petitioner does not comply with or adhere to the

terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

(Lisa Gill)
May 30, 2017 Judge
rts

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
09-06-2017 19:32:58 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation