SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shri Ashok vs The Government Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019

BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

WRIT PETITION NO.11964 OF 2016 (GM-POLICE)

BETWEEN:

SHRI. ASHOK
S/O LATE PANDURANGA NAIDU
AGED 45 YEARS
R/AT. D-1252, A3-9
VEERABADRESHWARA NILAYA
SHIVAKUMARSWAMY BADAVANE
2ND STAGE, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS
HADADI ROAD, DAVANGERE-577006.
… PETITIONER
(By Mr. BASAVARAJ PATIL, ADV., (ABSENT))

AND:

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
HOME DEPARTMENT
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001.

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
C.O.D. CARLTON HOUSE
BANGALORE-560001.

3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
NRUPATUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560009.

4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
C-BLOCK, DEVRAJ URS LAYOUT
DAVANGERE, DISTRICT-577006.

5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BADEWANIPOLICE STATION
2

OPP HIGH SCHOOL GROUND
BESIDES FAMILY COURT
DAVANGERE-577006.
… RESPONDENTS

(By Mr. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, LEARNED AGA FOR R1 – R5)

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 227 of
the Constitution of India, praying to direct R-2 to take up
investigation in Cr.No.77/2014 for the offences punishable
under Sec.143, 147, 498(A), 324, 504, 506, 114, 302 r/w
149 of IPC and report and etc.

This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in
‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-

ORDER

None for the petitioner.

Mr.Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional

Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 5.

2. In this petition under Articles 226 227 of

the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia seeks

a direction to respondent No.1 to take up the

investigation of criminal case No.77/14, which has been

registered for the offences punishable under Sections

143, 147, 498A, 324, 504, 506, 114 302 read with

Section 149 of Indian Penal Code,1860.
3

3. When the matter was taken up today,

learned Government Advocate submitted that the police

after completion of the investigation has filed ‘B’ report

on 20.10.2015 before the Competent Court and the

petitioner being aggrieved have already filed objections

to the aforesaid report.

4. In view of the fact that the investigation is

already concluded and the petitioner has filed objection

to the ‘B’ report, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a

liberty to the petitioner to prosecute the proceedings,

which are pending before the Magistrate.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation