1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
WRIT PETITION NO.11964 OF 2016 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. ASHOK
S/O LATE PANDURANGA NAIDU
AGED 45 YEARS
R/AT. D-1252, A3-9
VEERABADRESHWARA NILAYA
SHIVAKUMARSWAMY BADAVANE
2ND STAGE, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS
HADADI ROAD, DAVANGERE-577006.
… PETITIONER
(By Mr. BASAVARAJ PATIL, ADV., (ABSENT))
AND:
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
HOME DEPARTMENT
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001.
2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
C.O.D. CARLTON HOUSE
BANGALORE-560001.
3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
NRUPATUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560009.
4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
C-BLOCK, DEVRAJ URS LAYOUT
DAVANGERE, DISTRICT-577006.
5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BADEWANIPOLICE STATION
2
OPP HIGH SCHOOL GROUND
BESIDES FAMILY COURT
DAVANGERE-577006.
… RESPONDENTS
(By Mr. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, LEARNED AGA FOR R1 – R5)
—
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 227 of
the Constitution of India, praying to direct R-2 to take up
investigation in Cr.No.77/2014 for the offences punishable
under Sec.143, 147, 498(A), 324, 504, 506, 114, 302 r/w
149 of IPC and report and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in
‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER
None for the petitioner.
Mr.Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional
Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 5.
2. In this petition under Articles 226 227 of
the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia seeks
a direction to respondent No.1 to take up the
investigation of criminal case No.77/14, which has been
registered for the offences punishable under Sections
143, 147, 498A, 324, 504, 506, 114 302 read with
Section 149 of Indian Penal Code,1860.
3
3. When the matter was taken up today,
learned Government Advocate submitted that the police
after completion of the investigation has filed ‘B’ report
on 20.10.2015 before the Competent Court and the
petitioner being aggrieved have already filed objections
to the aforesaid report.
4. In view of the fact that the investigation is
already concluded and the petitioner has filed objection
to the ‘B’ report, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a
liberty to the petitioner to prosecute the proceedings,
which are pending before the Magistrate.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
