SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shri Prakash & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 4 September, 2019

$~34
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 04.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4419/2019
SHRI PRAKASH ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr. Swaran Kamal Singh, Adv. for P-
1 to 4.

versus

STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Crl.M.A. 35025/2019 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

Crl.M.C.4419/2019 Crl.M.A. 35024/2019

3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

263/2014 registered at Police Station Mian Wali instituted for the offences

punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

CRL.M.C. 4419/2019 Page 1 of 3

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 22.11.2004.

Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent

no.2, they started living separately from 11.06.2012.

7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their

well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the

Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated

06.01.2015 whereby they settled all their disputes amicably and started

living together as husband and wife, to discharge their matrimonial

obligations against each other.

8. The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and has

produced her Voter ID Card issued by Election Commission of India bearing

No.IPN2456761 (Original Seen and Returned) and submits that matter has

been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

CRL.M.C. 4419/2019 Page 2 of 3

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 263/2014 registered at

Police Station Mian Wali instituted for the offences punishable under

Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti.

13. Pending application also stands disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 04, 2019
ab

CRL.M.C. 4419/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation