SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Shri Vikram Rathor And Another vs The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) & Anr. on 20 August, 2018

$~67
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 20.08.2018
+ CRL.M.C. 4194/2018
SHRI VIKRAM RATHOR AND ANOTHER ….. Petitioners
versus

THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ANR. ….. Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner : Mr.Chander Bhan, Adv.

For the Respondent: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with
SI Surender Singh, P.S.Mianwali Nagar.
Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT

20.08.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 683 of 2014 under
Sections 498A/406/323/324/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station
Mianwali Nagar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended
that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have
settled their disputes by way of a settlement before the Family Courts
West, Tis Hazari, Delhi dated 07.08.2018 which has been executed
between the parties. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 30,000/-
has been agreed to be paid to respondent no. 2. The entire amount has

CRL.M.C. 4194/2018 Page 1 of 2
already been paid. The parties have already been divorced by way of a
decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 07.08.2018.

3. Respondent no. 2 who is present in court in person is identified
by the Investigating Officer submits that she has settled the dispute
with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not
wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

4. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and
respondent no. 2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been
settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in
futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the
parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of
justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to
quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating
therefrom.

5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 683 of
2014 under Sections 498A/406/323/324/34 of the IPC registered at
Police Station Mianwali Nagar, New Delhi and the consequent
proceedings there from are, accordingly quashed.

6. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
AUGUST 20, 2018/rk

CRL.M.C. 4194/2018 Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation