SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sidda vs State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court Sidda vs State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri

..vum ur nnnavnennn ruui-I L’OUR1:CE.: KARNATAKA H!GH COURT OF KARNATAKA H!GH COURT OF KARNATAKA E-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA E-HGH COUR1

Hi’ 11% HIGH COURT 0? KARf.HATAKA AT ~ mm}; THIS ME 135* my 01:’ ” 1 LV

BEFO%

um. HGWBLE !4.m.JUS’I’EEV,A$I-IC E~–$’;E–mR3I:fl3GE’1%’I

%

BETWEEE:

1. amm,s;fiA3I<:£.”x:H;>wIm _ – ‘ AGE:%4YEAR$” _

RjAK..R.$AG:&RA ‘V .

s.RmA1mAm;Tx§¢1i%ALUK ‘ ‘ axaxma, _ .. “

2. rm>r*rm;m % A _

age aasgmmwE’c.Qwma-

Aesgasvmxs

RM. Hfl}I§”G.A.LLY3iH,LAG’

K.R.8£;;;€i56«RA, *

%

m§;m’a%::_mam Pmmosmzs

4: . ‘V »s*r;«.%m; 903$: Ammmm % K;R.$.fiG–.”.R£’2 POLICE smrxon * gm? Eymmmn swam

J yirmza mmzcmm mwonnam

1 FV Smfiowmpm Heal’?

Giant

W…” AV; mmmam mun comer or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH

1.335. ms.

Tfifi C Petitaion hr filed under Se¢!ian..’_%E5~9″ Crfifl. Ea} rafimsc the petiticnezra on bail in Cr,_I~’:’:J.11’4f(T?”——.T sf Pofice Station, Mandya £9: punishable under secwna 143, 302 13=’f–‘£.3’;V:af V

“I’§5:@ Petfiion cmzxnng’ cnfor 3 V’

Cour: mafia the f’¢l]owing:-

mmadem med .A§§’;j;:’»’§Zi.C.Z¥a.73fO’? aga1’mt 24 amused r ifi;G1ud%.V””‘ pemm fur flue aflrmm p1.zi’ 1!’s3mV 302 new with

M9 mpct.

2% in brief in that the

3?I¢iaA§i murdfl me Chandra on

amtzsed Hoa.13 and 14 [pmamt

~ ~ the spot. The Sessions Carurt disrrfinaed the $2′ the pefifianam for bail, by im order dated

IZBH.

V. ….-mmmnnun nxun L..)UK| U”li’: KARNATAKA I’-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiC-EH COUR1

3* madam, me mm eounacsl % peménnm mhmim that as the peumnm mar the scum czf than hacident,

far as the gum:-mu against. the He fizrtlssesr submits aw mama mm further

mmtsady flngnmlié. can bail.

4* the learned

mt,}A rwpcndem rmda oat the

C’§5{§r-2,O 4 – eyew1’t::tmaea-. They haw swam guardhg the place at

V im1:ié6..*ncfi_’df R9. 1.

% mnrdesr is wwuted brutafiy. mm am nine anguram. mm .5 cammunibed fracture of the OO%«O.OOO%s1m md mmpkte laceratim of the mm. The alleged

ofimm £3 §L1rzishahI:a with death tar hnpriaanment far life.

€3.14.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation